Am I the only one who finds this interpretation of Till's arguments questionable? As I understand it, Till is not claiming that "God is omnipotent", "God is omniscient", and "there is more than one inerrant gospel record" are contradictory. My understanding (based on reading "The Resurrection Maze") is that Till is claiming that the set of events {E1, E2, E3 ... En} is inconsistent, where E1..En is the set of all events mentioned in all four gospels.
It seems to me as though Richard Davis is either misrepresenting or (more probably) misunderstanding Till's argument. However, if I'm not mistaken, Till has had some email contact with Davis, and perhaps Till really did make this argument in his email conversation.
Farrell, do you think that Davis has understood your argument correctly? For that matter, do you think that *I* have understood your argument correctly?
Sincerely,
Rob Berry
-- berry@bronze.coil.com (for work-related email use robby_berry@oclc.org) http://www.coil.com/~berry/ PGP public key available via finger, my WWW home page, or upon request. I speak for nobody but myself.
Jonathan Creighton Berry, born 5:21am, August 3rd, 1995. Welcome to Earth! Visit the Jonathan Berry Home Page: http://www.coil.com/~berry/baby.html