Science & The Bible(was First human)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 02:48 AM 3/31/98 -0600, D. T. Billings wrote:

>TOD

>Where is the logic in concluding that insects have four legs and two 

>arms, considering that they utilize all six to walk around?

>

>I may consider a lion's front paws "hands" (since it uses its paws in 

>some instances as we do our hands), but I would then be forced to 

>conclude that he goes on his hands and feet, because it is unquestionable 

>that he "goeth upon" all four legs, nevermind what I want to call the 

>front ones.  It would be incorrect to say that the lion "goeth upon" two 

>feet, because it still utilizes what I might call "hands" to "goeth upon."


As I wrote in another message, you're missing the entire
point. The truth of this concept does not lie in how many
arms or legs an insect has but whether or not these insects
are suitable for human food. These nitpicking, tangential
attacks do nothing to further the cause of your Atheistic
religion.

Dick Jones

• Previous message: Science & The Bible(was First human)
• Next message: Science & The Bible(was First human)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]