Bell and Shadows

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>Christian Doscher

>The NT says that Jesus is the "fulfillment" of the OT laws.

>

>Two Questions:

>

>1) Where does any NT author PROVE, instead of 

>ASSUME, such? (the NT book of Hebrews does

>nothing but assume it)


Matthew Bell
Where does the NT state its purpose as being to prove, (and by such I take
you to mean provide logical and sound arguments), 'that Jesus is the
fulfillment of the OT laws.' It must be some sort of fallacy to fault a
book for not proving something it never claims to be trying to prove! So
establish first that the NT's purpose is what you claim and then you will
have a valid question. 


>Christian Doscher

>2) Where does the OT indicate that it's ceremonial laws were

>only a temporary shadow, and that a future messiah was the

>real "substance"?


Matthew Bell
Why should it need to indicate such for the NT claim to be true?


Thanks
M.Bell

• Previous message: A moral God?
• Next message: Bell and Shadows
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]