Christian insanity

Matthew Bell errancy@infidels.org
Mon, 31 May 1999 14:34:54 +0100 (00928175694, 199905311336.OAA23545@klingon.netkonect.co.uk)



> >> TILL
> >> I certainly don't think that the Bible teaches that infants will
> >> go to hell either, so if you believe in original sin, what is
> >> your position on the fate of infants?
> >
> >Matthew Bell
> >My position is that they are in the hands of the Judge of all the
> >earth who will do right.
>
> TILL
> Yeah right! The "judge of all the earth" may order the extermination of
> entire civilian populations because they didn't belong to the right
ethnic
> group, the judge of all the earth may approve the rape of children, the
> judge of all the earth may approve the massacre of babies, the judge of
all
> the earth may send a pestilence to kill 70,000 people for the offense of
> just one person, the judge of all the earth may kill a baby because its
> parents committed adultery but let their parents off scott free, but the
> judge of all the earth will always do that which is right. Get a life,
Matt. Matthew Bell You need to substantiate the above charges with texts. I am more than sure that they are to be relied on more than your own colourful interpretation of them.
>
>>>TILL
>>>At any rate, what you are now saying seems to be
>>>inconsistent with the position you have taken in the past.
>>>Do you remember the issue over the NT statement that
>>>those who are not for me are against me? I recall that
>>>your argument was that children who were intellectually
>>>incapable of being "for Jesus" are nevertheless against
>>>him by virtue of original sin. Have youchanged that position?
>>
>>Matthew Bell
>>No, that has not changed. All are born in sin and at enmity to
>>God. Any salvation from hell which would extend to infants
>>who die is purely through the mercy and grace of God, not in
>>any merits of the infant/child.
>>
>
>TILL
>When I find time, I think I'll go back and check your postings in
>my files to see what you really said at that time. Yes, I have
>kept everything that far back. It was in 1997, wasn't it?
Matthew Bell Am I suppossed to be impressed or shaking in my boots because you keep files from way back? If so, I am sorry to disappoint you, but I am neither. As for when the discussion you refer to took place I don't know the year, only that it was fairly early on after I joined the list. Thanks M.Bell