God and babies/children

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> > G.R.Gaud

> > No, what I am stating is what I wrote above: YOU were begging the

> > question "how do you know that babies/children are hell-deserving?"

> > and you still haven't answered that question. How do you know this?

> > Show us chapter and verse instead of trying to turn the tables on

> me,

> > as is your wont when you're cornered. The rest of what you wrote is

> > superfluous and so won't get a reply.

> 

> Matthew Bell

> If I recall correctly I admitted that I did beg the question and

> corrected my post accordingly. Some of us aren't afraid to admit to

> moments of carelessness.

> 

> G.R.Gaud

> Yes, some of us aren't. And some of us do not run from tough problems

> by trying to trun the tabels (sic) on their opponents in a debate. You

> haven't answered the question you begged Matt.


Matthew Bell
What sort of amateurish reasoning is this? I make a statement which begs
the question, it is pointed out to me, I admit such and amend my post
accordingly and then I am expected to defend the initial fallacious
statement rather than the corrected one. You really need to do some work on
your logic skills. 

> 

> 

> > Matthew Bell

> > How do you know that the purification of their sinful nature is not

> > covered

> > by the atonement of Christ?

> >

> > G.R.gaud

> > Up to your old tricks again, I see. Trying to turn the tables one by

> > redirecting the question at me. Sorry, won't work. You haven't

> replied

> > to what I wrote above. Are you going to do that, or will you just

> keep

> > trying to evade the problem?

> 

> Matthew Bell

> Well, if you can assume then why can't I? I assume it is the most

> reasonable and logical position that the blood of Christ atones and

> purifies those sinful infants/babies/children who die in their sin. Oh

> and there isn't a problem except in your mind.

> 

> G.R.gaud

> I didn't assume anything Matt, I gave scriptures that you still

> haven't answered. If you don't want to answer just say so and we'll

> end this thread. Are you going to answer the question and respond to

> the verses I gave, yes or no? And please don't waste my time with your

> evasions.


Matthew Bell
You will need to repost the verses, as I don't recall reading any which
pinpointed Scriptures. I understand your desire to end the thread but
sorry, a no-go as far as I am concerned. 

Thanks
M.Bell

• Previous message: God and babies/children
• Next message: God and babies/children
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]