Bell and Shadows

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 11:40 AM 5/31/99 -0400, you wrote:

>TILL

>Oh, that's an easy one.  Let me answer it.  Unless the OT writers

>indicated that they intended ceremonial laws, the tabernacle,

>sacrifices, and such like to be "shadows" or "types," then it would

>have been pure speculation for the NT writers to say that they were,

>unless, of course, you beg the question of whether the writers were

>"inspired of God," and I suspect you do want to beg that question,

>don't you?

>

>Notice to Terry: The language in the above paragraph was sarcastic.

>

>RevGaud

>Notice to Joe Alward: Sometimes sarcasm gets the point across quite

>well.

>


TILL
You mean that Joe has said something about sarcasm?  Is he now on a crusade
to eliminate sarcasm from the list?



Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net

• Previous message: Bell and Shadows
• Next message: Bell and Shadows
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]