A moral God?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Matthew Bell wrote:

> 

> > << Matthew Bell

> >  Your point 1. is only valid if you establish that the babies were put to

> >  death for the sins of their fathers and not for their own sinful

> condition

> >  in Adam.  >>

> >

> > MUSSELWHITE

> > You are forgetting the last part of Deut.24:16, "a person shall be put to

> 

> > death for his own sin." You have not stated what sin the Amalakite babies

> 

> > committed.

> 

> Matthew Bell

> Their sin was in their nature, i.e. being a sinner.

> 

> 1. Sinners are at enmity to God and justly exposed to his wrath.

> 2. All human beings are born sinners.

> 3. Babies are humans.

> 4. Babies are sinners.

> 5. Babies are at enmity to God and justly exposed to his wrath.

> 

 Dave G.
Do these same rules apply to the Hebrews and those of us in the US and
UK?

• Previous message: A moral God?
• Next message: A moral God?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]