A comment
Farrell Till errancy@infidels.org
Thu, 10 Jun 1999 19:27:56 -0700 (00929086076, 2.2.32.19990611022756.008e8950@midwest.net)
At 06:01 PM 6/10/99 -0500, you wrote:
>At 06:50 PM 6/10/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>>RevGaud
>>>hello Jason,
>>>Please re-read your reply to Farrell. How can that "prove" that God
>>>is a personal God and "prove" that God works in individual's lives,
>>>when you admit that the proposition rests on a supposition, that
>>>supposition being "if existing...", that is, IF God exists? Saying
>>>"IF" makes it unsure and thus it cannot be proven.
>>
>>Jason:
>>
>>If i had said it without the if, i would probably have been accused of
>>sermonizing. Or would i have been?
>>
>>RevGaud
>>Either way, you would have been taken to task. BTW, Are you saying
>>you *didn't* contradict yourself?
>
>Jason:
>
>Redone: What do you mean "it proves nothing"? God, that is Jesus Christ, is a
>personal God and He acts on a personal level, as well as public. It might
>not prove it to *you* specifically because it's not your
>experience, but it does prove that God does work in
>individual lives.
>
>Am i contradicting myelf now?
>
TILL
No, you're begging the question now.
Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net