A comment

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 08:34 PM 6/10/99 -0400, you wrote:

>>RevGaud

>>What I meant was that your supposition was based on the speculation 

>>"if existing...", that is, you said "if God exists it proves he works 

>>in individual lives." You can't have it as proof that God works in 

>>people's lives while at the same time saying "if he exists." 

>>

>>You're begging the questions: What "proof" do you have that "God is a 

>>persoanl God?" And what proof do you have that he works in individual 

>>lives? Personal experience is not proof that God exists and it is not 

>>proof that God is a "personal God". It isn't proof of anything but a 

>>personal experience. It's all very subjective.

>

>

>Jason:

>Is murder subjective? Is rape subjective? Those are personal experiences to. 

>Using the logic you've used, i could say that love doesn't exist. I could

>say that depression doesn't exist. I could say that fear doesn't exist.

>Those are personal experiences to. 

>

>RevGaud

>Jason please! No offense but this ia really lame. Murder and rape are 

>crimes that can be seen by multiple witnesses and as such can be 

>proven beyong doubt, or at least with reasonable certainty. They 

>don't compare with an invisible God no one has ever seen or heard. 

>And they don't compare with the so-called experience of having "God 

>work in your heart." As personal as rape and murder may be, at least 

>I can see them or feel them and so can multiple witnesses, unlike 

>having "God work in youe heart," which is purely subjective. C'mon 

>man, THINK!


Jason:

You ignored the other examples i gave. What of love? What of depression?
What of fear?







-----------------------------------

"Which is worse: A Christian who does not know what he is talking about or
an atheist who does not know what he is talking about?"
 

http://www.origins.org

• Previous message: A comment
• Next message: A comment
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]