A comment
Farrell Till errancy@infidels.org
Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:49:41 -0700 (00929101781, 2.2.32.19990611064941.008f4390@midwest.net)
At 08:34 PM 6/10/99 -0400, you wrote:
>>RevGaud
>>What I meant was that your supposition was based on the speculation
>>"if existing...", that is, you said "if God exists it proves he works
>>in individual lives." You can't have it as proof that God works in
>>people's lives while at the same time saying "if he exists."
>>
>>You're begging the questions: What "proof" do you have that "God is a
>>persoanl God?" And what proof do you have that he works in individual
>>lives? Personal experience is not proof that God exists and it is not
>>proof that God is a "personal God". It isn't proof of anything but a
>>personal experience. It's all very subjective.
>
>
>Jason:
>Is murder subjective? Is rape subjective? Those are personal experiences to.
>Using the logic you've used, i could say that love doesn't exist. I could
>say that depression doesn't exist. I could say that fear doesn't exist.
>Those are personal experiences to.
>
TILL
For pity's sake, Jason, please look up the fallacy of reification in a logic
book, and you will see the error in your reasoning.
Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net